Skip to Content


People Petition to Confiscate Guns and Repeal the Second Amendment

The ignorance is shocking Surprise.

Federal judge: The morning-after pill should be available without prescription — regardless of age

Even if you discard the moral argument for a moment, this is still shocking when you consider the implications from the parental rights angle.  This ruling further erodes the notion of family, eliminating the parents' role in raising their kids, with all their wisdom.

Morality step back in, and what you have here is an excuse in a bottle.  The easier you make it for kids to do whatever they feel like, the more often they will do it.  No risk, no consequences, easy fixes.  Why not?

The hoops that I as a parent currently have to jump through just to get an asthma inhaler kept at my kids' school for emergencies are there by design to keep them safe, keep the medicine from being abused (intentionally or unintentionally), and so that we can be notified by their medical staff whenever it needs to be used.  But if a "" that's just fine and dandy.

A 7-year-old can be suspended for making a Pop Tart gun, and his 12-year-old sister can get the pill whether her parents like it or not. -


VP Biden offers dangerous advice for how a woman should protect herself at home

Not only dangerous, but also potentially illegal.  Nice going, Mr. Vice President.


Jesse Jackson: "these weapons can shoot down airplanes, they can blow up railroads"

!  I'd like to see the semi-auto that can take out a railroad.  Semi-auto grenade launcher maybe? Thinking Methinks he's been into the apple wine...

Ban the assault vehicle!

As it turns out,  aren't the only thing that surpass firearms in deaths per year.

More control, with added confiscatory goodness!

This time around, they'll be coming to take your guns - whether you like it or not.  From :

If you’re going to advocate gun controls, it helps to know what you’re talking about: . Layers of editorial oversight.

! More of .

. Just like the AARP should be held accountable every time an old person confuses the gas for the brake.


Opposition to SF "nudity ban" shows much of what’s wrong w/ modern-day liberalism

San Francisco gets classier and classier.  Most city officials, in a far-too-rare display of common sense, wouldn't even allow this kind of thing for "special" events.  The fine folks of Frisco think they should be able to strut around naked in public whenever and wherever they want. Sick From

A San Francisco Supervisor has proposed a public nudity ban, with exceptions to be made for sex-themed parades and festivals.  The :

San Francisco's lawmakers are voting Tuesday on whether to ban nudity in a  city where anything goes, including clothes.

The ordinance would prohibit nudity in most public places. It represents an  escalation of a two-year fight between a group of men who strut their stuff  through the city's famously gay Castro District and the supervisor who  represents the area.

Supervisor Scott Wiener's proposal would make it illegal for a person over  the age of 5 to "expose his or her genitals, perineum or anal region on any  public street, sidewalk, street median, parklet or plaza" or while using public  transit.

Syndicate content

by Dr. Radut