Skip to Content

Ridiculous

VP Biden offers dangerous advice for how a woman should protect herself at home

Not only dangerous, but also potentially illegal.  Nice going, Mr. Vice President.

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL7D5C264552294B54?rel=0&feature=playe...)

Jesse Jackson: "these weapons can shoot down airplanes, they can blow up railroads"

LOL!  I'd like to see the semi-auto that can take out a railroad.  Semi-auto grenade launcher maybe? Thinking Methinks he's been into the apple wine...

Ban the assault vehicle!

As it turns out, hammers aren't the only thing that surpass firearms in deaths per year.

More control, with added confiscatory goodness!

This time around, they'll be coming to take your guns - whether you like it or not.  From Say Uncle:

If you’re going to advocate gun controls, it helps to know what you’re talking about: … banning assault rifles or limiting high-capacity ammunition, …. Layers of editorial oversight.

I’m a gun owner and a conservative but …

The assault weapons ban did no good but we should pass one anyway because GUNS! More of the same.

Make the NRA accountable for the actions of gun owners. Just like the AARP should be held accountable every time an old person confuses the gas for the brake.

AOL.com comes out for gun bans.

Opposition to SF "nudity ban" shows much of what’s wrong w/ modern-day liberalism

San Francisco gets classier and classier.  Most city officials, in a far-too-rare display of common sense, wouldn't even allow this kind of thing for "special" events.  The fine folks of Frisco think they should be able to strut around naked in public whenever and wherever they want. Sick From Sister Toldjah

A San Francisco Supervisor has proposed a public nudity ban, with exceptions to be made for sex-themed parades and festivals.  The AP reports:

San Francisco's lawmakers are voting Tuesday on whether to ban nudity in a  city where anything goes, including clothes.

The ordinance would prohibit nudity in most public places. It represents an  escalation of a two-year fight between a group of men who strut their stuff  through the city's famously gay Castro District and the supervisor who  represents the area.

Supervisor Scott Wiener's proposal would make it illegal for a person over  the age of 5 to "expose his or her genitals, perineum or anal region on any  public street, sidewalk, street median, parklet or plaza" or while using public  transit.

Rampant looting after hurricane Sandy

Wow.  Just... wow.

The liberal mentality is never on more open display than when Obama’s base has an opportunity to “spread the wealth around”:

A wave a looters followed the Sandy storm surge in Coney Island, creating a double-whammy for business owners trying to pick up the obliterated pieces.

The thieves started down Mermaid Avenue Tuesday morning as the chest-high water receded, turning the seaside community known for its hotdogs and tourist attractions into a lawless free-for-all.

“People were running in and out of Rent-A-Center carrying these big flat screens. They were holding on tight,” said witness Aisha John, 20. “I couldn’t understand how someone could steal a big TV in broad daylight, but no one cared.”

Why should anyone care? Obama has stolen $trillions from our children and grandchildren who will be left to pay off the deficit, yet many people don’t care enough to vote against him.

As with the Democrat Party, the theft is justified with the vile criminal ideology of the Left:

“Look, they’ve been looting our wallets for too long,” said a young male who claimed he helped himself to a TV at the Rent-A-Center.

Good thing Mayor for Life Bloomberg made the city safe by only allowing criminals to have guns.

American parents losing the right to raise their kids

Look out for the eroding of parental authority.

Several news stories seem to indicate that America’s moms and dads are losing ground in the effort to raise their children as they see fit. To wit:

In Rhode Island, the Cranston school district announced it was banning father-daughter and mother-son events because a complaint from the American Civil Liberties Union indicated they violate state law. The civil rights group filed on behalf of a single mother who said her daughter suffered discrimination because she doesn’t have a daddy with whom she can attend the daddy-daughter dance.

“This is 2012 and [public schools] should not be in the business of fostering blatant gender stereotypes,” Steven Brown of the Rhode Island ACLU was reported to have said.

Which blatant gender stereotype is that? While single parent families are unfortunate in a lot of cases, it happens. I don't see the reason to cancel dances. How about adding a father/son or mother/daughter social that celebrates those relationships as well?

Syndicate content


by Dr. Radut