Liberty

Ron Paul introduces a bill to repeal section 1021 of NDAA


(http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uZeZnCuknh0)

Ron Paul has introduced legislation that would repeal portions of the National Defense Authorization Act. Specifically, the Congressman from Texas is referring to section 1021 of the NDAA, which he says is so vague that it leaves the door open for the detention of American citizens without trial. 

16 year old girl accused of "terrorism" plot against classmates

And here is an example of just how easy it will be to get tagged under the NDAA.  It doesn't take a lot to be called a terrorist these days, and based on what I read here, it doesn't even need substantiation.

A 16-year-old Iowa girl is facing terrorism charges in what police allege was a plot to harm other students, according to news reports.

Ottumwa Police say Emily Six (photo) allegedly began trying to recruit students for "a plan to harm a number of students," The Ottumwa Courier reports (via AP). Police offered no details.

Six was arrested Thursday, charged with conspiracy to commit terrorism and taken to a juvenile-detention facility.

Her father, Michael, told the Courier that police investigated five other students and singled her out, saying she was bullied. He said Emily is no terrorist, describing her as "a shy girl who enjoys church and hopes to become a veterinarian," the paper writes.

He reviewed Emily's Facebook page and her chats. "I'm not finding the stuff the police have found," he said. "A lot of things aren't adding up."

NDAA signed on New Year's Eve. What comes next?

Got your tinfoil hats on? Good. A couple of excerpts from articles I've read recently about the National Defense Authorization Act. What does it mean and what is possibly to come? First from NaturalNews:

Even while committing an act of pure treason in signing the bill, the unindicted criminal President Obama issued a signing statement that reads, in part, "Moving forward, my administration will interpret and implement the provisions described below in a manner that best preserves the flexibility on which our safety depends and upholds the values on which this country was founded..."

Anyone who reads between the lines here realizes the "the flexibility on which our safety depends" means they can interpret the law in any way they want if there is a sufficient amount of fear being created through false flag terror attacks. Astute readers will also notice that Obama's signing statementhas no legal binding whatsoever and only refers to Obama'smomentary intentions on how he "wishes" to interpret the law. It does not place any limits whatsoever on how a future President might use the law as written.

Click through the links to read all of it. Makes sense though. If he was actually against using the provisions in the act, he would have vetoed it like he said he was. Smoke and mirrors. Here's one more:

FEMA looking to build “Temporary Camp Services” in all 50 states

Here's another followup on NDAA information. The passage of the National Defense Authorization Act would authorize the military to imprison citizens without charge or trial simply by meeting some of the criteria of a broadly defined potential terrorist.

Now since the Senate passage of the bill, it appears FEMA is ramping up efforts to build detention camps. SHTFPlan has this:

Missing a finger? Got guns and ammo? How about emergency supplies? TERRORIST!!!

I posted recently posted about legislation that would allow the U.S. military to detain citizens indefinately without charge or trial (Posse Comitatus, anyone?). Here is a vid from Senator Rand Paul that describes those who could be considered a domestic terrorist under existing laws. Pretty much our entire state qualifies by this definition. Excerpted from SHTFPlan:

It’s not just the hundreds of thousands of members in the alternative media community that are pointing out the dangers to liberty posed by government’s anti-terror legislation. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), like his father Dr. Ron Paul (R-TX), puts the platitudes and pointless bickering aside to tackle the real issues – the underlying fundamental issues that threaten our very way of life.

In this speech calling for the removal of the detainee provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act, Senator Paul highlights, in surprising detail, activities that are now considered by Homeland security and law enforcement to be suspicious and potentially terroristic in nature:

Sourced via StanDeyo.com; Video Excerpt Below

Syndicate content