Skip to Content

September 2010

Obamacare is even worse than the critics thought

Originally from the Washington Examiner, where you can read the whole story, I saw an exerpt over at Moonbattery.  Here is the summary, use the Examiner link for the detail.

  • Obamacare won't decrease health care costs for the government.
  • Obamacare covers elective abortions, contrary to Obama's promise that it wouldn't.
  • Obamacare won't allow employees or most small businesses to keep the coverage they have and like.
  • Obamacare will increase insurance premiums — in some places, it already has.
  • Obamacare will force seasonal employers … to pay huge fines, cut hours, or lay off employees.
  • Obamacare forces states [many of which can't afford it] to guarantee not only payment but also treatment for indigent Medicaid patients.
  • Obamacare imposes a huge nonmedical tax compliance burden on small business.
  • Obamacare allows the IRS to confiscate part or all of your tax refund if you do not purchase a qualified insurance plan.

Sounds awesome, I can't wait till it all kicks in.

UFCW: It's Wal-Mart's fault

This clip is from The Daily Show.  A union takes on Wal-Mart but runs into some unexpected difficulties.  Funny stuff.

Veto by Gov. Chris Christie shuts down abortion clinics in N.J.

I'm not crying a river over this news from National Review.  Planned Parenthood should not be receiving public funds to operate, for legal and moral reasons, but without them they'd go out of business.  That's exactly what's happening in New Jersey after Governor Chrisie clamped down on the spending there.

Part of Gov. Chris Christie’s belt-tightening plan for New Jersey was the termination of $7.5 million in public funding for Planned Parenthood clinics in the state, a decision Democrats in the legislature countermanded with a bill that cleared the Senate with a 30-10 vote — sufficient to override a veto. But when that veto came and the Democrats scheduled an override vote, Republicans in the legislature backed down, and the measure failed 23-17.

Now, Planned Parenthood facilities in the state are shuttering their doors:

After the New Jersey state Senate defeated an attempt to override the decision of Gov. Chris Christie to cut off state taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood abortion businesses, the first facility run by the national abortion giant is closing.

The Cherry Hill Courier Post newspaper says a Planned Parenthood facility located on Haddonfield Road and operated by Planned Parenthood of Southern New Jersey will close down.

PP-SNJ stands to lose as much as $160,000 in taxpayer funds because of Christie’s decision and the upholding of his veto. With the closing of the Cherry Hill center, Planned Parenthood customers seeking abortions or other “services” must go to PP centers in Camden, Bellmawr, and Edgewater Park.

More here.

Get Lucky at Impact Guns

Impact Guns is offering up an S&W M&P .45 in its latest giveaway.  Click here or see below for details.  If you need a place to leave a comment to enter the contest, click the "Add new comment" link below this post.

You can enter to win by going to any gun blog or forum, such as gunblogs.org, thefirearmblog.com or gunforum.com, and write a comment about Impact Guns. You may enter by commenting about Impact Guns on any discussion board or personal website (except for social networking websites such as Facebook, Twitter, or MySpace). You can search gun blogs, or gun forums to find many places to post. Please be creative in your search. Also, if you want to earn some tech-savy points on our books, you can link your comment back to our website.

Once you have left a comment go to the Sweepstakes Entry Form and fill out the form of where you posted a comment. We will keep track of all comments. This will be your entry for the sweepstakes.

One entry per person.

This sweepstakes will run for five weeks beginning August 23, 2010 and November 4, 2010. Must be legally eligible to win.

Keep the Dream Alive – Vote Life, Vote Recovery – Vote 2010

Today, Americans are worried about their future, and about a government determined to implement policies that just don't work. But like its predecessor, "Better, Prouder, Stronger," "Mourning in America" offers a new hope -- if we can just get our government to return to time-tested policies that can spark a rebirth of liberty.

()

Top 20 Pro-Socialism Sound Bites of Obama, Advisors and Allies

Not really hiding their intentions at all, are they?

(http://www.blip.tv/file/4142594/)

Taxpayer funded 2-1-1 dial-an-abortion

The list of things that you and I must subsidize at the whims of Washington keeps growning. via WND:

The American Life League is asking constituents to contact a legislative committee in Washington and oppose a pending $700 million plan that could turn tax funds into payments for a special referral service sending women to Planned Parenthood for abortions.

The bill, H.R. 211, has been pending since last year but ALL said it is expected to be pushed through the House Energy and Commerce Committee over the next few days. It would set up nationwide a 2-1-1 phone number for questions about services and agency opportunities.

"In the hands of the Obama administration – Planned Parenthood's very own marketing and outreach team – this number could easily be used to 'help' women find 'comprehensive reproductive health care,'" said Judie Brown, founder of the pro-life organization.

"Translation: This number will probably be used to direct unsuspecting, confused pregnant women to Planned Parenthood and other abortion mills – courtesy of you, the taxpayer," she said.

The bill calls for initial funding of about $150 million per year, with subsequent years allocated $100 million.

U.K. to citizens: All your paycheck are belong to us

This should end well Worried via joehuffman.org

Via Alan we have this chilling scenario proposal:

The UK's tax collection agency is putting forth a proposal that all employers send employee paychecks to the government, after which the government would deduct what it deems as the appropriate tax and pay the employees by bank transfer.

What’s next?

I think I can guess.

First, total control of the money. You will no longer need cash because all the financial transaction will go through the government via your ID card.

After that you will no longer need money because the government will just take care of everything in their database. The government can assign you your living space and will have food other things delivered (or not) as the government thinks you need it.

They should have shot a bunch of politicians while they still had the tools to do it.

True amount of debt much higher than reported

This is kinda scary.  I thought that over $13 trillion in debt was bad.  Turns out that would be a nice figure, if what these guys are saying is correct.  In 1980, debt was 33% of our GDP.  Now it's at 92%.  It will overtake the GDP in two years at the current rate. 

THE actual figure of the US' national debt is much higher than the official sum of $US13.4 trillion ($14.3 trillion) given by the Congressional Budget Office, according to analysts cited on Sunday by the New York Post.

"The Government is lying about the amount of debt. It is engaging in Enron accounting," said Laurence Kotlikoff, an economist at Boston University and co-author of The Coming Generational Storm: What You Need to Know about America's Economic Future.

"The problem is we're seeing an explosion in spending," added Andrew Moylan, director of government affairs for the National Taxpayers Union.

In 1980, the debt - the accumulated red ink incurred by the Federal Government - was $US909 billion.

This represented some 33 per cent of gross domestic product, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

Thirty years later, based on this year's second-quarter numbers, the CBO said the debt was $US13.4 trillion, or 92 per cent of GDP.

The CBO estimates the debt will be at $US16.5 trillion in two years, or 100.6 per cent of GDP.

But these numbers are incomplete.

Physicist throws global warming under the bus

From Sister Toldjah, where I originally ran across this article from a physics professor who sounds like he knows what he's talking about.  I am not against using common sense to set rules or change the way things are done for the sake of healthy, sustainable living.  But I also think that such a fuss has been made of greenhouse emissions and climate change when we have, in reality, made such a microscopic impact that it is ridiculous.

Shrieks of “HERESY!!” and “APOSTASY!!” must be echoing through the Cathedral of the Church of Anthropogenic Global Warming right about now, as a former University of Ottawa professor says that fossil fuels are insignificant to the amount of CO2 in the air:

The present (2010) historic maximum of anthropogenic (caused by humans) fossil fuel burning is only 8% or so of global primary production (GPP) (both expressed as kilograms of carbon per year, kg-C/y). GPP is the rate at which new biomass (living matter) is produced on the whole planet. And of course all biomass can in principle be considered fuel that could be burned with oxygen (O2) to produce CO2 gas, H2O water, energy, and an ash residue.

This shows the extent to which anthropogenic energy production from fossil fuel burning is small in comparison to the sun’s energy delivery to Earth, since biomass primary production results from the sun’s energy via photosynthesis.

(…)

Given all the fuss that is made about the present rate of fossil fuel burning (2010; 0.8 x 10^13 kg-C/y where 10^13 = 10,000,000,000,000 with thirteen zeros), it is important to keep in mind that this represents an amount of CO2 release comparable to or somewhat less than the CO2 released by simple breathing from humankind and its domestic animals [LINK]. The combined biomass of humankind and its domestic animals (cattle, sheep, goats, chickens, pigs, pets, etc.) is in turn estimated to be only 0.04% of Earth’s living biomass (all expressed as kilograms of carbon, kg-C), which is a lot more CO2-producing breathing. (Ants, for example, are estimated to represent ten to one hundred times the biomass of humankind and ants can be argued to have “transformed” the planet and its ecology far more than humans.)

Emphasis added.

Dr. Rancourt has a very Left/Progressive outlook, but a portion of his conclusion is worth quoting:



© Copyright 2014 mangrums.net

deliciousness
about seo